Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Kiddushin 108:1

תרי תנאי נינהו ואליבא דר' יהודה

Two Tannaim differ as to R'Judah's view.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to the first who deals with trespass, R. Judah holds Jerusalem to be sanctified; according to the second, on vows, it is not.');"><sup>1</sup></span> 'Ulla said on Bar Pada's authority: R'Meir used to say that hekdesh, deliberately used, is secularised; unwittingly, it is not secularised.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., 'Ulla agrees with R. Johanan supra 53b.');"><sup>2</sup></span> And only in respect to sacrifice was it said that it is secularised by unwitting [misuse].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Torah decreeing a sacrifice (Lev. V, 15) . as though it were converted to hullin. Nevertheless it actually remains hekdesh.');"><sup>3</sup></span>

Daf Shevui to Kiddushin

According to the resolution, people disagree as to what R. Judah held. Some held that he believed that the stones of Jerusalem were sacred. Some held that he thought they were not.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Full ChapterNext Verse