Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Kiddushin 109:6

אימר דשמעת ליה לרבי מאיר בקדשי קדשים בקדשים קלים מי שמעת ליה א"ל ההוא מרבנן ורבי יעקב שמיה קל וחומר קדשי קדשים מתחללים קדשים קלים לא כל שכן

hence according to R'Meir too, although hekdesh, by deliberate misuse, is secularised, yet intrinsic sanctity cannot be secularised!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For unwitting misuse, in R. Judah's opinion, is the same as deliberate misuse in R. Meir's.');"><sup>11</sup></span> - There he does not intend to withdraw it into hullin; here he does.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e,, deliberate conversion, according to R. Meir, is stronger than unwitting misuse, on R. Judah's opinion, and therefore it secularises even intrinsic sanctity.');"><sup>12</sup></span> But when do you know R'Meir to hold this?

Daf Shevui to Kiddushin

This difficulty is raised against R. Oshaya who said that according to R. Meir if one finds an animal near Jerusalem he can redeem it and use the money to buy a peace-offering. A peace-offering is a sacrifice of lower sanctity. But we only know that R. Meir said this about something that is of the highest sanctity. Do we know that he said this about sacrifices of lower sanctity.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Daf Shevui to Kiddushin

The argument here is pretty straightforward. If R. Meir holds that items of higher sanctity can be desacralized, all the more so items of lower sanctity.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse