Commentary for Kiddushin 116:2
נימא כתנאי הגונב טבלו של חבירו משלם לו דמי טבלו של חבירו דברי רבי ר' יוסי בר' יהודה אומר אינו משלם אלא דמי חולין שבו מאי לאו בהא קמיפלגי דמר סבר טובת הנאה ממון ומר סבר טובת הנאה אינה ממון
I meant this, he reassured him, R'Assi of Huzal<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' An ancient town below Nehardea, but nearer to Sura, within whose province it lay in matters of jurisdiction. Obermeyer, p. 299f.');"><sup>3</sup></span> agrees with you.
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
Tevel is untithed produce. If one steals tevel from another, he clearly must pay back the value of the hullin, non-sacred portions. But does he have to pay back the terumah, which would have had to have gone to the priests anyways? Rabbi says he must pay back the terumah value. This could be because he holds that the one from whom the terumah was stolen has now lost the rights to give it to whom he wants. And this benefit counts as money.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy