Commentary for Kiddushin 116:4
ואיבעית אימא דכולי עלמא כמי שהורמו דמיין וטובת הנאה אינה ממון והכא בדשמואל קמיפלגי דאמר שמואל חיטה אחת פוטרת את הכרי
[For it was taught.] He who steals his neighbour's tebel must pay him the value of his tebel:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Including the terumoth and tithes which were yet to be separated. Ran in Ned. ');"><sup>5</sup></span> this is Rabbi's view.
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
The Talmud now goes back to interpreting the dispute to be about regular tevel, not inherited tevel. They disagree about Shmuel’s rule that giving one grain of wheat as terumah makes the rest of the stack permitted. Rabbi Yehudah Hanasi says that it does, therefore, the thief has to pay back the entire value of what he stole because he could have given only one grain as terumah. R. Yose b. R. Yehudah holds that the person must give the real amount of terumah. Therefore, the thief pays back hullin. The right to give the terumah to whomever he wants is not considered money.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy