Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Kiddushin 33:12

חדא דתפשתה מרובה לא תפשתה תפשתה מועט תפשתה ועוד עבד מעבד הוה ליה למילף

But perhaps [the comparison is] with the least [sum] of 'arakin?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Five shekels, Lev. XXVII, 6.');"><sup>16</sup></span> - It is written, as the Lord thy God hath blessed thee.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 75, n. 5.');"><sup>17</sup></span> But let us learn the meaning of 'giving' from a slave: just as there, thirty, so here too thirty: [for] firstly, if you seize much, y cannot hold; if you seize little, you can hold; and moreover, one should rather deduce slave from slave? - R'Simeon deduces 'poverty' from 'poverty'.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' [Or, 'he learnt on tradition (from his teacher; the deduction of) 'arakin 'poverty" (from)="" 'poverty"="" 'it="" being="" the="" rule="" that="" no="" one="" may="" draw="" a="" conclusion="" from="" qezerah="" shawah="" on="" one's="" own="" authority,="" v.="" pes.="" ');"=""><sup>18</sup></span>

Daf Shevui to Kiddushin

The word “giving” is also used in the context of evaluations of a person’s worth (Leviticus 27). But there are two reasons R. Judah prefers to learn from the context of killing a slave. First of all, there is a general principle according to which when there are two options, go with the smaller one. Essentially what this means in this context is that we know the master is liable for at least thirty, but we cannot be sure that he is liable for fifty. Thirty is a safe bet, fifty is not.
The second reason is obvious—better to learn from a similar context.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse