Commentary for Kiddushin 45:10
רבא אמר כסף קבלת רבו גרמה לו שטר קבלת אחרים גרמה לו:
If so, the same applies to deed? - This deed is separate and that deed is separate.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The wording of the two deeds, purchase and manumission, are different: consequently the same reasoning does not apply.');"><sup>9</sup></span> But here too, this money is separate and that money is separate?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Being given for different purposes.');"><sup>10</sup></span>
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
Rava offers a different reason for why R. Meir holds that a slave can be set free by money given by others but not by a document accepted by others. The slave goes free when his master receives the money. It is not that others are causing him disadvantage. But if the slave goes free by document he goes free when the others accept the document. Therefore, they are causing him detriment, and one may not cause detriment to another without his consent.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy