Commentary for Kiddushin 45:5
אי הכי אימא סיפא בשטר על ידי עצמו על ידי עצמו אין על ידי אחרים לא ואי מדעתו על ידי אחרים אמאי לא
and we learned: One may obtain a privilege for a person in his absence, but cannot so act to his disadvantage.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Such an action being invalid.');"><sup>5</sup></span> Hence it obviously means with his knowledge [consent], and we are informed this: only through the agency of others [can he be emancipated thus,] but not through his own, thus proving that a slave has no rights of acquisition apart from his master.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As explained in the note on the Mishnah, q.v.');"><sup>6</sup></span>
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
R. Meir goes on to say that if he is going free by document, he must accept the document himself. Others cannot accept it on his behalf. But if he is consenting to going free, then why can’t others accet a document to set him free?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy