Commentary for Kiddushin 50:1
כתנאי (ויקרא כב, כד) ומעוך וכתות ונתוק וכרות כולן בביצים דברי רבי יהודה
This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The question whether castration of testicles is a patent blemish and so frees the slave.');"><sup>1</sup></span> is disputed by Tannaim. And that which is bruised, or crushed, or broken, or cut [ye shall not offer unto the Lord]<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XXII, 24.');"><sup>2</sup></span> - all these refer to the stones: that is R'Judah's opinion.
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
Earlier we saw a dispute over whether a slave whose master cuts off his testicles goes free. This dispute matches the dispute here over whether an animal whose testicles have been removed can be offered as a sacrifice.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy