Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Kiddushin 65:8

טעמא דבהן יושב ומהרהר הא לאו הכי לא

yet he did not rise up before me!' It also happened that Bar Kappara - others state, R'Ishmael son of R'Jose - was sitting in a bath-house, when R'Simeon B'Rabbi entered and passed by, yet he did not rise before him. Thereat he was offended and went and complained to his father.' I taught him two-thirds of a third of "The Law of Priests".'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' . The Midrashic exposition of Leviticus, so called because many of its laws refer to priests. It was presumably divided into three sections, and he had taught him two-thirds of one of these. - The work is also known as the Sifra. [Albeck, Untersuchungen uber die ohbvf ,ru, halakischen Midraschim, p. 89, n. 1, however, questions this identification, but regards the as denoting the book of Leviticus itself.]');"><sup>12</sup></span>

Daf Shevui to Kiddushin

Again, another sage does not stand up in front of R. Shimon b. Rabbi and the latter gets upset. Rabbi provides an excuse for why the sage might not have stood in front of his son, but the principle remains—the sage should have stood up.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse