Commentary for Kiddushin 73:16

מכדי רבי ישמעאל אהיכא קאי אנסכים בנסכים

Said R'Akiba to him: But the Sabbath, in connection with which 'dwellings' is stated,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rashi: Ye shall kindle no fire throughout your habitations on the Sabbath day - Ex. XXXV, 3. Tosaf.: it is the Sabbath of the Lord in all your dwellings. - Lev. XXIII, 3. (Heb. moshaboth is variously translated dwellings or habitations in the E.V.)');">¹⁹</span> is yet binding both within and without the land?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence dwellings implies extension, in all places. The same holds good of libations, which are accordingly to be offered at private bamoth too. Hence the passage is thus interpreted: Now that you are in the wilderness and have a tabernacle, private bamoth are altogether forbidden. But when ye come unto the land of your habitations, before a tabernacle is erected (as it was subsequently at Shiloah) , private bamoth for sacrifice will be permitted, and there too libations will be required.');">²⁰</span> The Sabbath, replied he to him, is inferred a minori: if light precepts must be practised both within and without the land, surely the Sabbath, which is more stringent! Since Abaye said: 'Which Tanna disagrees with R'Eleazar? R'Ishmael,' it follows that R'Eleazar differs in the direction of [greater] stringency.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the first suggested meaning of the Mishnah must be the correct one.');">²¹</span> This proves it. Now consider: to what does R'Ishmael refer? To libations. But in the case of libations

Daf Shevui to Kiddushin