Commentary for Kiddushin 97:9
הכי השתא התם אידי ואידי דשבח ממון פליג ברישא והוא הדין בסיפא הכא דשבח יוחסים הוא אם איתא דפליג נתני
that is grown up', whereas he has none; or on condition that he has not, and he has, which is a monetary advantage, does he not disagree there either! But [what you must say is that] he differs in the first clause,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Viz., in the Mishnah on 48b.');"><sup>11</sup></span> and the same is understood of the second;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Infra b.');"><sup>12</sup></span> so here too [in respect to superiority] of birth, h differs in the first clause, and the same applies to the last clause.
Daf Shevui to Kiddushin
The Talmud rejects Mar bar R. Ashi. In the case of financial advantage, since the mishnah taught that R. Shimon disagrees with regard to the first clause, it assumes that the same dispute can be applied to the second clause. However, when the issue is one of lineage, if he disagrees then it should have taught his disagreement. The fact that it does not implies that R. Shimon agrees that if the deception was with regard to lineage, she is not betrothed.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy