Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Menachot 126:8

<br><br><big><strong>הדרן עלך כל המנחות</strong></big><br><br>

Is not the view of R'Jose son of R'Judah identical with that of his father? - There would be a difference between them in the case where one actually did so.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to R. Jose son of R. Judah a baked meal-offering consisting partly of cakes and partly of wafers is absolutely invalid, just as the meal-offering would be invalid if brought partly dry and partly mingled with oil. According to the father, however, if a person brought cakes and wafers for his meal-offering it would be accepted as valid.');"><sup>8</sup></span> <big><b>MISHNAH: </b></big>R'ISHMAEL SAYS, ON THE SABBATH<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., if the second day of the Passover, which is the sixteenth day of Nisan, fell on a Sabbath. As the work in connection with the Omer involved the infringement of the laws of Sabbath, on the Sabbath therefore a smaller quantity of barley was used and fewer men employed.');"><sup>10</sup></span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 126:8. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.

Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse