Commentary for Menachot 178:16

מתקיף לה רב מנשיא בר גדא אלא מעתה כבש הבא עם העומר ששחטו שלא לשמו תהא מנחתו כפולה שאם אי אתה אומר כן פסלתו

under any name other than its own, it sti requires the drink-offerings; for should you not say so, you would render it invalid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And it could not be offered at all; for it is not permissible to offer it as another offering since it was originally set apart as a guilt-offering, an to regard it as a freewill-offering is out of the question for a guilt-offering is only brought as an obligation; accordingly it can only be offered as the guilt-offering of a leper, and as such it requires drink-offerings (v. infra 90b) .');">²³</span> R'Menashia B'Gadda demurred, In that case, if the lamb that is offered with the 'Omer was slaughtered under any name other than its own, its meal-offering should nevertheless be doubled; for should you not say so, you would render it invalid.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For it cannot be offered as another offering, and as the lamb of the 'Omer it requires a double meal-offering.');">²⁴</span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 178:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.