Commentary for Menachot 96:13

ואי גמר שלמים משלמים ליגמר נמי אשם מאשם אשם נזיר ואשם מצורע מאשם גזילות ואשם מעילות או אשם גזילות ואשם מעילות מאשם נזיר ואשם מצורע

But then if he infers peace-offering from peace-offering he should also infer guilt-offering from guilt-offering, viz. , the guilt-offering of the Nazirite and of the leper from the guilt-offering for robbery and for sacrilege, and then the guilt-offering for robbery and for sacrilege from the guilt-offering of the Nazirite and of the leper!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With the result that all guilt-offerings are valid whether the lamb offered was of the first year or of the second year.');">¹⁸</span> - R'Shimi B'Ashi answered, We infer what is offered not according to the prescribed rite from what is similarly offered not according to the prescribed rite,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Thus the lambs of pentecost, when offered not according to their prescribed rite but e.g., under another name, are valid by inference drawn from the case of freewill peace-offerings, which are valid even though not offered according to their prescribed rite.');">¹⁹</span>

Explore commentary for Menachot 96:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.