Commentary for Menachot 96:14
אמר רב שימי בר אשי דנין דבר שלא בהכשירו מדבר שלא בהכשירו ואין דנין דבר שלא בהכשירו מדבר שבהכשירו
but we do not infer what is offered not according to the prescribed rite from what is offered according to the prescribed rite.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., that the guilt-offering of the Nazirite or of the leper should be valid when offered not according to its prescribed rite (e.g., if a sheep of the second year was offered) , by inference from the guilt-offering for robbery or for sacrilege which according to the prescribed law must be a sheep of the second year.');"><sup>20</sup></span> Do we not?
Explore commentary for Menachot 96:14. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.