Commentary for Nedarim 142:2

איבעיא להו גירושין כשתיקה דמיא או כהקמה דמיא

whilst Beth Hillel maintain: Her father and second husband [together] must annul her vow, and the husband does not cut it apart.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Therefore the husband only weakens it; hence he is not finished with it, and so, on remarriage, his authority is transmitted to the second husband (Ran). Asheri, however, explains that the question whether the father needs the co-operation of the second husband is independent of whether the husband cuts the vow apart or weakens the stringency of the whole; it is mentioned here merely because, as was stated on 69a, they do differ on this question too. ');">²</span>

Explore commentary for Nedarim 142:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.