Nedarim 142

בית שמאי סברי נדרים נמי שראוי לארוס נתרוקנה רשות לאב ומיגז גייז בית הלל סברי אביה ובעלה אחרון מפירין נדריה ולא מיגז גייז

— Beth Shammai maintain that even in respect to vows known to the arus, his [the husband's] authority passes over to the father; also he [the husband] cuts [the vow] apart;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 220, n. 4; because he cuts the vow apart, therefore his powers therein are finished when he has annulled it, and consequently, even if she remarries, the father can annul the vow entirely alone, without the co-operation of the second arus. ');">¹</span>

איבעיא להו גירושין כשתיקה דמיא או כהקמה דמיא

whilst Beth Hillel maintain: Her father and second husband [together] must annul her vow, and the husband does not cut it apart.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Therefore the husband only weakens it; hence he is not finished with it, and so, on remarriage, his authority is transmitted to the second husband (Ran). Asheri, however, explains that the question whether the father needs the co-operation of the second husband is independent of whether the husband cuts the vow apart or weakens the stringency of the whole; it is mentioned here merely because, as was stated on 69a, they do differ on this question too. ');">²</span>

למאי נפקא מינה כגון שנדרה ושמע בעלה וגרשה ואהדרה ביומיה אי אמר מר כשתיקה דמי מצי מיפר לה ואי אמר מר כהקמה דמי לא מצי מיפר לה

The scholars propounded; Is divorce as silence or as confirmation?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If a woman made a vow, and her husband heard it and divorced her on that day, without first annulling the vow. ');">³</span> What is the practical difference? E.g., if she vowed, her husband heard it, divorced and remarried her on the same day: now, if you say it is as silence, he can now disallow her; but should you rule that it is as confirmation, he can not?