Commentary for Niddah 29:50

אין לה וסת אימא חזאי יש לה וסת וסת קביע לה

Does not, on the contrary, the reverse stand to reason, since in the case of a woman who has no settled period it might well be assumed that she experienced a discharge, but where she has a settled period [she should be presumed to be clean] since her period was fixed? — Rather, if the statement was at all made it was made in the following terms: R. Huna said, This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That 'within her usually clean period' no examination is required. ');">⁴⁵</span>

Explore commentary for Niddah 29:50. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.