Commentary for Niddah 49:45
א"ל
[did he rule that the abortion of a sac constitutes a valid birth,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And the son born subsequently is no firstborn, and no redemption money on his behalf need be paid to the priest. ');"><sup>40</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Niddah 49:45. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.