Commentary for Pesachim 42:4
ולא יסיק בו תנור וכירים: פשיטא לא צריכא לר' יהודה דאמר אין ביעור חמץ אלא שריפה סלקא דעתך אמינא הואיל ואמר ר' יהודה מצותו בשריפה בהדי דקא שריף ליה ליתהני מיניה קמ"ל:
That is obvious? - It is necessary [to state this] only in respect of the hours [when leaven is interdicted] by Rabbinical law.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., in the sixth hour.');"><sup>7</sup></span> For R'Gidal said in the name of R'Hiyya B'Joseph in R'Johanan's name: He who betroths from the sixth hour and onwards, even with wheat of Cordyene. We have no fear of his betrothal.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Tosafot on Pesachim
...It was cinged before its time of biur hametz - he is allowed to derive benefit even after the time - For example, that is disqualified from being eaten by a dog, that in any other manner - this would not be allowed (to derive benefit). This is similar to the case of bread that became spoiled cite in the first chapter of Pesachim (15B).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Rashi on Pesachim
...No, it is necessary - When the mishna say it is allowed, we are referring to after the time of burning the hametz, for example - the hametz was cinged with a good fire before its time that resulted in abolishing its taste and appearance.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy