Commentary for Shabbat 87:10
אמר רב יהודה א"ר מטה שיחדה למעות אסור לטלטלה מיתיבי' רב נחמן בר יצחק מטלטלין נר חדש אבל לא ישן
this is permitted.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Because R. Judah rejects the prohibition of mukzeh on account of an interdict.-Being of metal, the lamp is not regarded as repulsive, even when it has been used. ');"><sup>15</sup></span> Shall we say that R. Judah accepts [the prohibition of] mukzeh on account of repulsiveness, but rejects [that of] mukzeh on account of an interdict? But it was taught, R. Judah said: All metal lamps may be handled, except a lamp which was lit on the Sabbath?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Var. lec.: on that Sabbath. ');"><sup>16</sup></span> But if stated, it was thus stated: R. Zera said: A shaft on which a lamp was lit<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. P. 202, n. 7. Here this is the reading of cur. edd. ');"><sup>17</sup></span> on the Sabbath, all agree that it is forbidden [to handle it]; if a lamp was not lit therein, all agree that it is permitted. Rab Judah said in Rab's name: If a bed is designated for money, it may not be moved.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Mere designation renders it forbidden, even if money was not actually placed there. ');"><sup>18</sup></span> R. Nahman b. Isaac objected: A NEW LAMP MAY BE HANDLED, BUT NOT AN OLD ONE.