Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Commentary for Shabbat 89:9

בעא מיניה רבי שמעון בר רבי מרבי

And you must say the same of peaches, quinces, and other kinds of fruit.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though they are fit during the process of drying. ');"><sup>23</sup></span> Which Tanna is this? Shall we say, R. Judah: seeing that he maintains [the prohibition of] mukzeh even where one does not reject it with his own hands, how much more so where he does reject it with his own hands!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Hence it is unnecessary to state it where he puts fruit aside for drying. Even if he merely stores it is forbidden, according to R. Judah. ');"><sup>24</sup></span> Hence it must surely be R. Simeon?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Proving that he admits mukzeh in other cases too, ');"><sup>25</sup></span> — After all, it is R. Judah, yet the case of eating is necessary: I might argue, since he was engaged in eating, no designation is required; hence we are informed that since he took them up to the roof, he withdrew his thoughts thence. R. Simeon b. Rabbi asked Rabbi:

Rashi on Shabbat

"Channukah lamp" - after it was extinguished
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Rashi on Shabbat

"Before the Chabarei" - so that they don't see it in the courtyard. For as we have learned (Shabbat 22b), one places the Channukiah in the tefach close to the public domain. They could therefore see that the Jews were lighting fires, but they had made a decree not to light fires. Or perhaps it was one of their festivals, and they had forbidden lighting fires anywhere except for houses of idolatry.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse