Commentary for Sukkah 107:10

ע"ש שבתוך החג אצטריך ליה לאשמעינן כדרבי אליעזר בן יעקב אטו מי קאמר ליתני הא ולא ליתני הא ליתני הא וליתני הא תנא ושייר מאי שייר דהאי שייר

It was necessary to teach the instance of the eve Shabbat during Hol Hamoed in order to teach us that the law is in agreement with R. Eliezer b. Jacob. Did he say let it teach one case instead of the other? [The question in fact was] let this one and that one be taught? [The Tanna of our Mishnah] might mentioned some and omitted others. But what else did he omit to justify this omission also?

Explore commentary for Sukkah 107:10. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.