Commentary for Sukkah 46:2

ומי אמר אביי ר"מ חייש למיתה ור' יהודה לא חייש והתנן בת ישראל שנשאת לכהן והלך בעלה למדינת הים אוכלת בתרומה בחזקת שהוא קיים

But did Abaye say that R. Meir is concerned because of the possibility of death while R. Judah is not concerned? But haven't we learned: If the daughter of an Israelite was married to a priest, and her husband went to a country beyond the sea, she may eat of terumah on the presumption that he is still alive

Explore commentary for Sukkah 46:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.