Commentary for Temurah 51:25
אי לאו דאשמעינן הוה אמינא
I might have thought that the reason of R'Meir is not because of the rule: 'Hold to the first statement', but the reason [really] is because a sin-offering which has been mixed up with another dedication is offered,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Where there are two separate dedications mixed up in the animal, and although both have effect on it, since there is mixed up in the animal a dedication which makes it fit to be offered, we ignore the other dedication which makes it unfit to be offered (Rashi) .');"><sup>14</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Temurah 51:25. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.