Commentary for Temurah 61:2
למ"ד טרפה (אינה) ילדה משכחת לה כגון שנטרפה ולבסוף עיברה
we can explain [the Mishnah here] as referring to a case where e.g. , it became trefah and afterwards became pregnant, and the point at issue is that R'Eliezer holds that a product of combined causes<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The mother alone being forbidden but not the father. We cannot say here that the point at issue will be whether an embryo is to be regarded as the thigh of its mother, for since it became trefah before pregnancy it cannot be regarded as the thigh of its mother, as it possesses an element which is permissible, viz., from its sire (Rashi) .');"><sup>2</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Temurah 61:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.