Commentary for Yevamot 41:2
מיתיבי ואם בעלו קנו תיובתא
exempts [does so because] a positive precept supersedes a negative one; and he who maintains that it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The act of intercourse. ');"><sup>3</sup></span> does not exempt holds that the positive precept here does not supersede the negative one since [in this case] <i>halizah</i> is possible.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Which would not conflict with the negative precept, while the requirements of the positive one would also be complied with. ');"><sup>4</sup></span> An objection was raised: If they<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 121, n. 5. ');"><sup>5</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yevamot 41:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.