Commentary for Yevamot 41:3
לימא תיהוי נמי תיובתא דר"ל אמר לך ר"ל כי אמינא אנא היכא דמקיימי מצוה אבל הכא חליצה במקום ייבום לאו מצוה היא
had intercourse [with any of the forbidden women] they acquire [her as wife]!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. supra p. 121, n. 12. ');"><sup>6</sup></span> -This is indeed a refutation. May this<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The Baraitha cited. ');"><sup>7</sup></span> be assumed to provide a refutation of the view of Resh Lakish also?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Who stated (supra 20b) that whenever it is possible to observe the positive, as well as the negative precept, the rule of the abrogation of the one by the other is not to be applied. ');"><sup>8</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Yevamot 41:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.