Commentary for Zevachim 101:17

או אינו אלא מזבחה של עולה יהא ליסוד אמר ר' ישמעאל קל וחומר מה שיריים שאין מכפרין טעונין יסוד תחלת עולה שמכפרת אינו דין שטעונה יסוד

Can you then argue from what is its proper way to that where the same is not the proper way?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' E.g., you argue that the emurim if kept overnight do not descend because the flesh if kept overnight is fit. But the flesh may be kept overnight, whereas the emurim may not. Similarly, when the Temple stood the flesh might not be taken out; whereas there were no boundaries at all in the case of the bamah.');">¹²</span>

Explore commentary for Zevachim 101:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.