Commentary for Zevachim 161:2

אלא אמר רבא בבלול לא פליגי כי פליגי בכוסות לר"א אית ליה רואין לרבנן לית להו רואין

Now, do they not disagree where [the blood itself] is mingled? Surely it was taught: R. Judah said: R. Eliezer and the Sages did not dispute about the blood of a sin-offering which was mixed with the blood of a burnt-offering, [both agreeing] that it must be offered [sprinkled]; [if it was mixed] with the blood of a roba' or a nirba', [they agree that] it must not be offered. About what do they disagree? About the blood of an unblemished [animal] which was mixed with the blood of a blemished [animal]; there R. Eliezer maintains that it must be offered, whether [the blood itself is] mingled or whether the goblets [are mixed]; while the Sages say that it must not be offered! - R. Judah when teaching R. Eliezer's view relates it to both mixing [of the blood itself] and [to that of] the goblets; but the Rabbis hold that they disagree about goblets [only].

Explore commentary for Zevachim 161:2. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.