Commentary for Zevachim 161:3

ובבלול לא פליגי והתניא א"ר יהודה לא נחלקו ר"א וחכמים על דם חטאת שנתערב בדם עולה שיקרב ברובע ונרבע שלא יקרב על מה נחלקו על דם תמימה שנתערב בדם בעלת מום שר"א אומר יקרב בין בבלול בין בכוסות וחכ"א לא יקרב

Abaye said: They learnt this only of the beginning of the sin-offering and the burnt-offering; but as to the end of the sin-offering and the beginning of the burnt-offering, all agree that the place of the burnt-offering is the place of the residue. Said R. Joseph to him: Thus did R. Judah say: The residue requires the projection. And thus said Resh Lakish: They learnt this only of the beginning of the sin-offering and the burnt-offering; but as to the end of the sin-offering and the beginning of the burnt-offering, all agree that the place of the burnt-offering is the place of the residue. Whereas R. Johanan-others say, R. Eleazar-said: There is still the controversy. <br>

Explore commentary for Zevachim 161:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.