Commentary for Zevachim 89:1

הלכתא למשיחא א"ל אביי אלא מעתה כל שחיטת קדשים לא לתני הלכתא למשיחא הוא אלא דרוש וקבל שכר ה"נ דרוש וקבל שכר הכי קאמינא לך הלכתא למה לי לישנא אחרינא א"ל הלכה קאמינא:

<br> [Do we need] a halachah [for the days of] the Messiah? - Abaye answered: If so, we should not study the whole of 'The slaughtering of sacrifices'? Yet we say, study and receive reward; so in this case too, study and receive reward. [He replied] This is what I mean: Why [state] a halachah? Another version: He replied, I mean, [Why state the] halachah? MISHNAH. THE SACRIFICES OF HEATHENS DO NOT INVOLVE LIABILITY ON ACCOUNT OF PIGGUL, NOTHAR, OR DEFILEMENT, AND IF [A PRIEST] SLAUGHTERS THEM WITHOUT [THE TEMPLE], HE IS NOT LIABLE: THAT IS R. SIMEON'S VIEW. BUT R. JOSE DECLARES HIM LIABLE.

Explore commentary for Zevachim 89:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.