Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Halakhah for Niddah 70:55

בשלמא לרב דאמר מעין אחד הוא משום הכי בעיא שבעה ימים נקיים

childbirth, the prescribed number of whose unclean days had passed,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'completed'. ');"><sup>53</sup></span> but not to a woman who gave birth in <i>zibah</i> who is required also to count seven clean days.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After the zibah. So long as she had not counted these days she remains subject to the uncleanness of zibah. ');"><sup>54</sup></span> Come and hear: Her sickness shall be unclean<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XII, 2. ');"><sup>55</sup></span> includes<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since otherwise the text is superfluous after the previous statement 'then she shall be unclean seven days as in the days of impurity' (ibid.). ');"><sup>56</sup></span> the man who had intercourse with her;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. that he becomes as unclean as she. ');"><sup>57</sup></span> 'her sickness shall be unclean'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XII, 2. ');"><sup>55</sup></span> includes<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 246. n. 12. ');"><sup>58</sup></span> the nights;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., that the uncleanness is not restricted to the days, though 'days' only were spoken of in the context. ');"><sup>59</sup></span> 'her sickness shall she be unclean'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. XII, 2. ');"><sup>60</sup></span> includes<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' V. p. 246. n. 12. ');"><sup>58</sup></span> a woman who gave birth while in <i>zibah</i> who remains in her uncleanness<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' After all discharge had ceased. ');"><sup>61</sup></span> until seven clean days have passed.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Infra 37b. ');"><sup>62</sup></span> This<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The last mentioned ruling. ');"><sup>63</sup></span> is quite intelligible according to Rab who said that there exists only one source, since it is for this reason that she<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To attain cleanness. ');"><sup>64</sup></span> requires seven clean days,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The discharge emanating from the same source as the unclean blood, the Torah (by its insertion of the superfluous text mentioned) ordained that cleanness cannot be attained before the woman had counted seven clean days. ');"><sup>65</sup></span>

Sefer HaChinukh

And about this they, may their memory be blessed, said (Niddah 35b) that there is one 'wellspring' and the Torah made it impure, and the Torah [also] made it pure. [This is] meaning to say that the blood of birth that the Torah made impure and the blood of purification that the Torah made pure are from one place; and that is [that] both of them come out from the source (the uterus), which is a place of impurity. However the Torah made the matter depend on time and made impure the blood that comes from her at one time and made [it] pure at a second time. And blessed is the One that knows all wisdom, as He did every thing for a correct and necessary reason. And He, blessed be He, knows that up to a certain time, the blood is damaging; and [that] from then on, it is not damaging.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Sefer HaChinukh

And the content of discharge is that which issues as a type of fluid from a man from the orifice of the member and he has no desire or pleasure from its emission. And they, may their memory be blessed, said (Niddah 35b) that it is similar to barley dough and, likewise, similar to the white of an addled egg; but semen is not like this, since it is similar to the white of an egg that is not addled. And that is the difference between them to distinguish between this and that.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse