Halakhah for Sanhedrin 113:15

משום דקבעי למיתני סיפא ישראל בכותי מותר תנא רישא אסור

But R. Shesheth saidthus: The scholars stated, A heathen is executed for the violation of fourprecepts [including idolatry]. But is a heathen executed for idolatry? Surelyit has been taught: With respect to idolatry, such acts for which a Jewishcourt decrees sentence of death [on Jewish delinquents] are forbidden tothe heathen. This implies that they are merely forbidden, but their     violationis not punished by death! — R. Nahman b. Isaac answered: Their prohibition is their death sentence.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., in speaking of heathens, when the Tanna teaches that they are forbidden to do something, he ipso facto teaches that it is punishable by death; for only in speaking of Jews is it necessary to distinguish between prohibition and punishment. ');">29 R. Huna, Rab Judah, and all the disciples of Rab maintained: A heathen is executed for the violation of the seven Noachian laws; the Divine Law having revealed this of one [murder], it applies to all. Now is a heathen executed for robbery? Has it not been taught: 'With respect to robbery — if one stole or robbed30

Sefer HaChinukh

It laws: For example, that which our Rabbis, may their memory be blessed, said (Sanhedrin 57a) how much would the theft be that obligates the robber in repayment? Any theft that is worth a small coin (perutah). But less than that is not in the category of repayment, even though he has transgressed a Torah prohibition. And as we shall write at length in the negative commandment of "You shall not rob" (Sefer HaChinukh, 20, 29), [it is] because Israelites are the children of Avraham, Yitschak and Yaakov - generous men, the children of generous men. And it is a well-known thing that that even a poor Israelite will pardon less than the worth of a perutah that was stolen from him, and he will not want to seek it at all. And therefore, they, may their memory be blessed, said (Bava Kamma 105a) that one who robs three bundles, worth three perutah at the time of the theft, and they depreciate in the hand of the robber and became worth two perutah - even though he returned two - he is obligated to return the third; since we judge according to the time of the robbery, and [the] third was already worth a perutah at that time. [If] he stole two that are worth one perutah [together] and he returned one, there is robbery here [but] there is not repayment here.

Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy

Previous Verse Full Chapter Next Verse