Halakhah for Yevamot 168:8
אטו חייבי לאוין מי לא קתני והדר תני והא קתני כהן הדיוט שנשא אלמנה וחלל שנשא כשרה
are permitted to their husbands but forbidden to their levirs,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Should one of the brothers die without issue. The son of the third generation is forbidden to marry the Egyptian of the second generation, while the son of the second generation is forbidden to marry the daughter of an Israelite. ');"><sup>15</sup></span> and if they married in the reverse order<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' I.e., if the son of the second generation married the daughter of an Israelite, while the son of the third generation married an Egyptian of the second generation. ');"><sup>16</sup></span>
Sefer HaChinukh
From the laws of the commandment is that which they, may their memory be blessed, said (Kiddushin 78a) that there is no liability for lashes until he has intercourse. But [if] he married her and did not have intercourse, he is not lashed - as there is no liability for lashes without intercourse. And [both] he and her are lashed; and that which they, may their memory be blessed, said (Yevamot 84b), "Fitting women are not [prohibited] from marrying disqualified men," is not from this matter at all - and we will explain the thing below on this page. As this one who has had intercourse with someone to whom she is forbidden, is also included in the obligation - and like the matter that they, may their memory be blessed, said that there is no difference between a woman and a man regarding all of the punishments of the Torah, except for the designated maidservant, [about] which I have written above in the Order of Vayikra in the commandment of a definite guilt-offering (Sefer HaChinukh 129).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy