Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Halakhah for Zevachim 200:19

לעולם דרבנן היא

Rabbi said: That is only as long as he was not buried; but if he was buried, [it is the day] without the [following] night. Now, this was reported before R'Jeremiah, whereupon he observed: That a great man like R'Joseph should say thus! Are we to assume then that Rabbi is more lenient? Surely it was taught: How long is he an onen on his account? As long as he is not buried, even for ten days: these are the words of Rabbi; but the Sages maintain: He observes aninuth on his account only on that day itself! Rather, explain it thus: How long does he observe aninuth on his account? The whole of that day without the [following] night. Rabbi maintained: As long as he is not buried, it embraces the [following] night.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' This then is the controversy alluded to by R. Hisda.');"><sup>23</sup></span> Now, it was stated before Raba: Since Rabbi maintained that the day of burial embraces the [following] night by Rabbinical law,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Obviously by Rabbinical law only, for aninuth even on the day of burial itself is Rabbinical only.');"><sup>24</sup></span> it follows that the day of death embraces the [following] night by Scriptural law.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Just as aninuth on the day of death is Scriptural.');"><sup>25</sup></span> Does then Rabbi hold that aninuth at night is Scriptural? Surely it was taught: 'Behold, this day [etc].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lev. X, 19. Aaron was explaining why he had not eaten of the sin-offering offered on the day of his consecration, viz., because he had lost two sons on that day.');"><sup>26</sup></span> I am forbidden by day yet am permitted at night;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since there were no other priests to eat thereof.');"><sup>27</sup></span> but [future] generations will be forbidden both by day and by night':<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Thus aninuth on the night following is Scriptural.');"><sup>28</sup></span> these are the words of R'Judah. Rabbi maintained: Aninuth at night is not Scriptural but a law of the Scribes! - In truth, it is Rabbinical.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Sc. the law of aninuth on the night after the day of death.');"><sup>29</sup></span>

Sefer HaChinukh

To not eat the second tithe in bereavement: To not eat the second tithe in bereavement. And I have written the content of the second tithe in the Order of Reeh Anochi (Sefer HaChinukh 473). And the content of bereavement from Torah writ is that one who has one of his relatives die on him is obligated to mourn for them - that day that [the relative] dies and he buries him, he is called a bereaved (onen). And they, may their memory be blessed, said explicitly that only the day of death and burial is the main bereavement from Torah writ. And [that is] specifically the day, but not the night, as it is stated (Leviticus 10:19), "And I ate the sin-offering of the day" - and they, may their memory be blessed, expounded (Zevachim 100b), "'The day' is forbidden, but it is permitted at night." And about this is it stated (Deuteronomy 26:14), "I have not eaten from it in bereavement" - meaning to say that if he ate from it in bereavement, he would have transgressed. And it is not only second tithes that it is forbidden to eat in bereavement, but rather one who eats any consecrated foods in bereavement is lashed for them (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Second Tithes and Fourth Year's Fruit 3:7).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse