Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Halakhah for Zevachim 231:27

מאי שנא התם דאמר (ליה) (יהושע ה, א) ולא היה בם עוד רוח ומ"ש הכא דקאמר (יהושע ב, יא) ולא קמה עוד רוח באיש

Then what is the sound of this tumult that we have heard? He has a precious treasure in His storehouse, which was hidden by Him nine hundred and seventy-four generations before the world was created,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Cf. Gen. Rab. I, 10 (Sonc. ed. p. 10) ; Cant. Rab. V, 11 (Sonc. ed. p. 243 and n. 3. a.l.) .');"><sup>35</sup></span> and He has desired to give it to His children, as it is said, The Lord will give strength unto His people.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ps. ibid. 11. - The Torah is the strength of Israel.');"><sup>36</sup></span> Forthwith they all exclaimed, The Lord will bless His people with peace.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ps. ibid. 11. - The Torah is the strength of Israel.');"><sup>36</sup></span> R'Eleazar said: He heard about the dividing of the Red Sea, and came, for it is said, And it came to pass, when all the kings of the Amorites heard [. how that the Lord had dried up the waters of the Jordan before the children of Israel] ;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Josh. V, 1. As 'heard' here refers to the drying up of waters, it has a similar connotation in connection with Jethro.');"><sup>37</sup></span> and Rahab the harlot too said to Joshua's messengers [spies]: For we have heard how the Lord dried up the water of the Red Sea.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Ibid. II, 10.');"><sup>38</sup></span> Why is, 'neither was there spirit in them any more written in the first text, whereas in the second it says, 'neither did there remain [stand] any more spirit in any man'?

Sefer HaChinukh

From the laws of the commandment are the blemishes that disqualify a sacrifice that the Sages, may their memory be blessed, enumerated (Mishneh Torah, Laws of Things Forbidden on the Altar 1:2) that are seventy-three. Fifty of them are whether with a man or with a beast, and twenty-three are unique to beasts and are not fitting to be with a man. And likewise, there are blemishes that are unique to man that are not fitting to be with a beast and they are ninety, as we shall write in this Order (Sefer HaChinukh 275) concerning blemishes that disqualify a priest. And so [too,] that which they, may their memory be blessed, distinguished between a permanent blemish and a transient blemish; and that which they said (Zevachim 116a) that the blemishes do not disqualify a sacrifice of fowl, as it does not state about them, "an unblemished male." And about what are these words speaking? About small blemishes. But a fowl the wing of which has dried up, or its eye was blinded or its leg cut off is forbidden on top of the altar. And the rest of its details are elucidated in the eighth chapter of Menachot (see Mishneh Torah, Laws of Things Forbidden on the Altar 1).
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull Chapter