Mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 161:34

ואי סלקא דעתך

For in as much as the flesh is not permitted to be eaten so long as the blood has not been sprinkled, [the warning that is given to the slaughterer] while he is slaughtering is a dubious warning, and a dubious warning is no warning.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Rashi suggests the deletion from the text of the last passage (from 'Why' to 'warning') on the ground that the argument is misleading and erroneous. For the reason why stripes are not incurred is not because of the dubious warning but simply because the slaughtering is no vyhja slaughtering (v. prec. n.) . V. however Tosaf. supra 80b, s.v. .');">¹⁵</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Chullin 161:34. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.