Mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 29:44

קצר וקצר מה לי אמר רבי אליעזר

Is R'Eliezer's reason in the previous case because two acts were committed, and that was why he ruled that he was liable for each act, so here also since he committed two acts [he is liable for each act]; or perhaps R'Eliezer's reason in the previous case is because the acts could not be united,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The various sexual connections are of necessity separate performances.');">²⁷</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Keritot 29:44. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.