Mesorat%20hashas for Ketubot 101:13

אימא סיפא כתב לה שדה שוה מנה תחת מאתים זוז ולא כתב לה כל נכסים דאית לי אחראין לכתובתיך חייב שהוא תנאי בית דין אתאן לר"י דאמר אחריות טעות סופר הוא

Read, however, the final clause: If he assigned to her in writing a field that was worth one maneh instead of the two hundred zuz and did not write for her, “All property that I possess is a lien for your ketubah,” he is liable [for the full amount] because it is a condition laid down by the court. Does not this represent the view of R. Judah who said that [the omission from a document of the clause] pledging property [is regarded as] a scribe’s error?

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Ketubot 101:13. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.