Mesorat%20hashas for Niddah 38:11
אם אינו מטמא משום כתם כו'
she must be deemed unclean'. If so, instead of saying, EVEN IF IT DOES NOT CONVEY UNCLEANNESS AS A BLOODSTAIN IT CONVEYS UNCLEANNESS AS A LIQUID, should he not have said 'on account of her observation'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of an actual discharge. ');"><sup>10</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Niddah 38:11. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.