Mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 4:3
<big><strong>גמ׳</strong></big> אטו גזילות וחבלות לאו דיני ממונות נינהו אמר רבי אבהו מה הן קתני מה הן דיני ממונות גזילות וחבלות אבל הודאות והלואות לא
[i. e. cases of indebtedness].And both clauses are necessary. For had the Tanna mentioned only MONETARYCASES I might have said that they included also cases of indebtedness. Hencethe necessity of the explanatory LARCENY AND MAYHEM; or again had the Tannamentioned only LARCENY AND MAYHEM, I might have said that these includedcases of indebtedness, and that the reason for specifying particularly LARCENYAND MAYHEM is that the regulation requiring three judges is laid down inScripture In connection with larceny and mayhem (the verse, <i>the masterof the house shall come near unto thejudges</i>,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The term 'Elohim' denoting 'Judges' occurs three times in this section, Ex. XXII, 7. ');"><sup>4</sup></span>
Explore mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 4:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.