Mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 4:9

לעולם קסבר עירוב פרשיות כתוב כאן ובדין הוא דליבעי נמי מומחין והאי דלא בעינן מומחין משום דרבי חנינא דאמר רבי חנינא דבר תורה אחד דיני ממונות ואחד דיני נפשות בדרישה ובחקירה

He should then demand<i>Mumhin</i> here also [since the term <i>Elohim</i> denoting <i>Mumhin</i> ismentioned in this place]. If on the other hand, he does not hold this view[and in this case the provisions in this section are limited to the casesof larceny as set forth], where is the authority for the necessity of threejudges? — Indeed the Tanna accepts the principle of 'transposition of sections'— and consequently, in accordance with the strict application of the Law,in cases of indebtedness he would require [three] <i>Mumhin</i> — neverthelessthey have become exempted from this regulation for the reason advanced byR. Hanina. For R. Hanina said:<a rel="footnote" href="#2b_9">⁹</a> Inaccordance with the Biblical law, the juridical procedure in regard to theinvestigation<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As to the day and hour. ');">¹⁰</span> andexamination<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' As to attendant circumstances. ');">¹¹</span> of witnesses appliesto monetary as well as to capital cases, for it is written,

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Sanhedrin 4:9. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.