Mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 146:16

אמר רב אשי מרישא נמי שמעת מינה דתנא ושייר מדלא קתני

'The man that eats of them while they themselves are levitically unclean is to be flogged, and that these laws do not apply to terumah'. He is apparently<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since flogging was mentioned. ');">³⁵</span> exempt only from flogging, but a prohibition<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To eat unclean terumah. ');">³⁶</span> remains. Whence is this derived? — Scripture stated. Thou shalt eat it within thy gates.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Deut. XV, 22. ');">³⁷</span> only 'it'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' May be eaten. ');">³⁸</span> but not any other;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Terumah. ');">³⁹</span> and a negative precept that is derived from a positive one [has only the force of] a positive.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Transgression of which is not punishable by flogging. ');">⁴⁰</span> R. Ashi said:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With reference to the question supra p. 494. n. 14. ');">⁴¹</span> From the first clause also<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Not only from the second. ');">⁴²</span> you may infer that the Tanna taught some<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of the restrictions that do not apply to tithe. ');">⁴³</span> and omitted others,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The uncircumcised among them. ');">⁴⁴</span> since he did not state

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Yevamot 146:16. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.