Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Related for Yevamot 146:16

אמר רב אשי מרישא נמי שמעת מינה דתנא ושייר מדלא קתני

'The man that eats of them while they themselves are levitically unclean is to be flogged, and that these laws do not apply to terumah'. He is apparently<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Since flogging was mentioned. ');"><sup>35</sup></span> exempt only from flogging, but a prohibition<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' To eat unclean terumah. ');"><sup>36</sup></span> remains. Whence is this derived? — Scripture stated. Thou shalt eat it within thy gates.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Deut. XV, 22. ');"><sup>37</sup></span> only 'it'<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' May be eaten. ');"><sup>38</sup></span> but not any other;<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Terumah. ');"><sup>39</sup></span> and a negative precept that is derived from a positive one [has only the force of] a positive.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Transgression of which is not punishable by flogging. ');"><sup>40</sup></span> R. Ashi said:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' With reference to the question supra p. 494. n. 14. ');"><sup>41</sup></span> From the first clause also<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Not only from the second. ');"><sup>42</sup></span> you may infer that the Tanna taught some<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Of the restrictions that do not apply to tithe. ');"><sup>43</sup></span> and omitted others,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The uncircumcised among them. ');"><sup>44</sup></span> since he did not state

Tosefta Bikkurim

There is a stringency with Terumah (the priestly portion of produce) that there is not with second tithe (which is exchanged for money and brought to Jerusalem) or first fruits, and [a stringency] with second tithe that there is not with Terumah. [With respect to the stringency of Terumah], we may not take [Terumah] except out of a mass [of produce] in close proximity (המוקף), nor may we take it except from [produce that is in] a finished state, nor may we take it except from the pure on behalf of the impure, or the medumma (a forbidden mixture of Terumah and chullin), and we are liable on it for an extra fifth, and it applies to all [species of] produce, which is not the case with first fruits. And it applies to all the years [of the seven-year agricultural cycle other than the seventh year], all of which is not the case with second tithe [which only applies to the first, second, fourth, and fifth years].
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse