Midrash for Chullin 126:21

ראה זו איה ולמה נקרא שמה ראה שרואה ביותר וכן הוא אומר

But since [according to R'Abbahu] the ra'ah and the ayyah are one and the same, it would follow then that the da'ah is not the same as the ra'ah and [this being so] why is it that here [in Leviticus] the da'ah is mentioned but there [in Deuteronomy], the purport of which is to add to the laws, the da'ah is not mentioned?

Explore midrash for Chullin 126:21. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.