Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Mishnah for Yevamot 163:1

רבי יהודה לטעמיה דאמר מין במינו לא בטיל

— R. Judah follows his own view; for he stated:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Zeb. 79a, Men. 22b. ');"><sup>1</sup></span> The law of neutralization takes no effect in homogeneous objects.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'a kind in its kind does not cease to exist'. ');"><sup>2</sup></span> [Had the piece] not been crushed, however, what [would have been the law]? Assumingly that it could not be neutralized! Why. then, was it taught. 'If, however, a piece of a levitically clean sin-offering was mixed up with a hundred pieces of clean and unconsecrated meat&nbsp;… neutralization cannot take place'?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Thus drawing a distinction between a mixture of consecrated and unconsecrated meat. ');"><sup>3</sup></span>

Mishnah Terumot

If there were two baskets, one of terumah and one of hullin, and a seah of terumah fell into one of them, but it is not known into which, behold I can assume that it had fallen into that of the terumah. [Two baskets] and it is not known which was of terumah and which of hullin, and he eats from one of them, he is exempt, and the second basket is treated as terumah and subject to the laws of hallah, the words of Rabbi Meir. But Rabbi Yose exempts it. If another person eats from the second basket he is exempt. If one man ate of both, he must repay the value of the smaller of the two.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Full ChapterNext Verse