Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Mishnah for Yevamot 163:13

בשלמא לריש לקיש קסבר בדרבנן נמי רבויא הוא דבעינן אלא לרבי יוחנן קשיא

Surely it was taught: If in front of two baskets, one of which contained unconsecrated fruit and the other that of <i>terumah</i>, were two <i>se'ah</i> measures, one containing unconsecrated fruit and the other that of <i>terumah</i>, and the latter fell into the former, behold these are permitted,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Even an Israelite may eat from the basket that contained the unconsecrated fruit. ');"><sup>33</sup></span> for it is assumed that the <i>terumah</i> fell into the <i>terumah</i> and the unconsecrated fruit fell into the unconsecrated fruit.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Tosef. Ter. VI end; Pes. 9b, 44a; Naz. 36b. ');"><sup>34</sup></span> And [in reference to this ruling] Resh Lakish stated: 'Only if the unconsecrated fruit<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In the basket. ');"><sup>35</sup></span>

Mishnah Terumot

If there were two baskets, one of terumah and one of hullin, and a seah of terumah fell into one of them, but it is not known into which, behold I can assume that it had fallen into that of the terumah. [Two baskets] and it is not known which was of terumah and which of hullin, and he eats from one of them, he is exempt, and the second basket is treated as terumah and subject to the laws of hallah, the words of Rabbi Meir. But Rabbi Yose exempts it. If another person eats from the second basket he is exempt. If one man ate of both, he must repay the value of the smaller of the two.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse