Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Musar for Eruvin 191:5

ועוד הישן בשמיני בסוכה ילקה אלא מחוורתא כדשנינן מעיקרא

be flogged?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' According to the submission here he should. As in fact, however, it is not only allowed to sleep in the sukkah on the eighth day but also, in accordance with a Rabbinical enactment, obligatory, how could the last reply be maintained?');"><sup>12</sup></span> It is perfectly clear, therefore,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Lit., 'but'.');"><sup>13</sup></span> that the proper explanation is the one originally given.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' That the point at issue is the question whether Sabbath is a time for the wearing of tefillin or not. (For an explanation of the use of the Sukkah, and the manner of using it on the eighth day of Tabernacles v. Rashi a.l.) .');"><sup>14</sup></span> Who is it<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Among the Tannas, who might be presumed to be the first Tanna of our MISHNAH:');"><sup>15</sup></span>

Shenei Luchot HaBerit

Commandment 391 makes it a transgression to cancel the guard of honour of the Temple, since the Torah writes: "ושמרתם את משמרת הקדש," and whenever the verb שמר is used, it implies a negative commandment, i.e. culpability if that שמירה is neglected.
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse