Talmud Bavli
Talmud Bavli

Musar for Gittin 69:16

גופא אמר רבי זירא אמר שמואל לא שנו אלא אלמנה אבל גרושה משביעין אותה

[The text above stated:] 'R. Zera said in the name of Samuel: This rule applies only to a widow, but to a divorced woman an oath is administered.' Cannot then a divorced woman recover her <i>kethubah</i> on [merely] taking a vow? Was not [a communication] sent from there<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' From Eretz Yisrael to Babylon. ');"><sup>14</sup></span>

Shenei Luchot HaBerit

The next difficulty is: How could a righteous son loved by his father not inform his father that he was alive and save him an untold amount of anguish? Even if Joseph had found himself at the end of the world, instead of in a country bordering on the land of Canaan, was he not duty bound to let his father know that he was alive instead of letting him suffer pain for twenty-two years?
Ask RabbiBookmarkShareCopy
Previous VerseFull ChapterNext Verse